http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publi...272612143.shtml

I wonder if Star Magazine has any photos or the two at Disneyland?

yep...they sure do...thanks to source at flipside...

Thanks for posting that..too cute. I'm jealous though. :wub:

I'm wondering when they had time to go to Disneyland ! :rotfl:

I wondered that too..they look very happy and in love...I remember when people thought she would be his doom lmao...He looks happy to me... :socute:

I LOVED this paragraph! :rocker:

The timing can't be better for the 'E' Train. A press release notes that March 20th marks the release of 'Elliott Yamin,' the debut album from one of American Idol's most memorable contestants. Set for release on Hickory Records ( a label affiliated with Sony ATV Music Publishing where Yamin is signed as a writer,) the CD boasts both a lion's share of songs co-written and performed by Yamin as well as participation from some of the entertainment industry's most respected songwriters and producers.




I am very happy for E and Jaime. I really think she has his best interest at heart and they look very in love. It would be very hard to feign looking that happy for over a year if she were just using him.

I honestly thought his manager would want him to appear "available"...But everyone reads "star" so it will def get his name out there to the masses...

That is too precious. Her myspace profile pic, at least this morning, was of the two of them with Mickey Mouse

Jaime's myspace profile pic is now a picture of the two of them with Mickey Mouse! Cute!

It's only March. Weren't they supposed to have met around finale time?

I am sure they are using "one year" loosely. It's been close to it, only a couple of months off.

Just like when Amanda would say they had been together a year but it was only about 8 months...just a round off I assume.

LOL Tabloids....wondered when this would start.....Elliott has arrived!

Great Timing! Thanks STAR!

Say goodbye to your private life E

This might have been happening for a long time, I just don't see it.......I don't look for garbage and speculation too much.

I think it's really none of my business who he dates, and I just hope that he's happy and inspired so that he keeps recording. She's beautiful.

He's adorable and she's beautiful, and they do seem to have so much fun together. I agree that, after all this time together, Jaime is probably a very good thing in Elliott's life. He clearly ADORES her, and it would appear that she adores him, too. They are both very fortunate. :glomp:

Elliott must be having the time of his life right now. Thats too cute/

I am so glad he is happy! He deserves it! :wub:

Good for them. And I'm glad that E is happy. :)

Thanks, Fabb, for the enlargened picture.

Thanks for the thread and for the pictures. Elliott and Jaime look very cute together and look like they were have fun at Disneyland.

I'm glad that he had some down time because the next few weeks are going to be crazy and incredibly busy.

Somewhere in the midwest, there is a young lady reading this and kicking herself for letting go of a good thing, and screaming: "That could've been me photographed giving Mickey a kiss!"

You are so right! Now that he is in the tabloids we should see pictures of him everywhere!

lol

You have to have respect for a girl who is a model and is willing to photographed as herself! That is a girl who is very well grounded!

I am happy for them both!

Okay we all know I'm not keen on her, but that is a very cute pic, and E is happy so it's all good ^_^

Very cute! It's good to see publicity for E and I'm glad he's happy! :)

They look adorable together. Now, this is the "happy" kind of picture STAR should show all the time....

It's good that E was able to get some downtime for once, as I'm sure he's been and will continue to be extremely busy with his work! Yes, it seems he and Jaime are closer than close and that the relationship is pretty genuine. Good for him!

"available" is Not married. A good looking girl just makes a man more available. Believe it or not! Women like a challenge just as much as a man does.
And a man without a girl is giving the message he's either gay or unattractive, a man with too many girls is a player, but a man with a dynamite and successful woman is interesting and definitely sexy and hot. This means Elliott is not gay, is able to hold on to a woman and is faithful, that makes him husband material.

:rocker:

This is priceless Parsimmon! You are a great descriptor!

You know I kinda thought this article opened the door for Elliott to talk about his g/f because the Salt Lake interview was the first time he talked about being in a relationship. He was asked in a couple of other intereviews and dodged the question. :glomp:

ETA: I bought the Star magazine today and the clip is in a section called "Couples NEWS".

I don't think he's available..he's involved..big difference...and I doubt anyone would think Elliott was gay because he didn't have a current g/f...I think other factors play into that assumption..

Very good observation, Pars!! Available DOES mean not married, :rocker:

Samimama, I agree with you 100 percent.

My thoughts on the subject are if a man and woman are in a serious relationship (but unmarried) it doesn’t mean either are open game to be hit on.

If someone hits on either of them wouldn’t the hitter automatically be considered a male dog or a female b***h? And I doubt Elliott is wearing Jamie on his arm as an ornament because it’s a good way to attract and score on other babes.

Last comment on Elliott. He took a great deal of time to ensure he had control of his career. I doubt he would let management dictate his personal life.

Gosh I remember commenting in another thread that I would never comment on Elliott’s personal life, but I guess I lied.

A warning to all you lovelies that think because my man (who I am not married to) is available to be hit on just because he has me on his arm (and I may be 50+, but he still calls me his hot sexy ornament), think again I will kick your ar_ _.

Love May

^^^^right on Sister..i'm not "married" either but my man sure ain't "available"....if ladies don't wanna take a trip to fist city they better not think that...jus' sayin..

Yes, I know he's "in a relationship", but that still means he's keeping his options open as one woman would put it.
I understand what y'all are saying, and I respect the relationship, but in terms of marketing...married is much more not available than "in a relationship".
Elliott may not be single, but he's not married. And people take that into account. I do.
He went from being in a relationship with WW to being in a relationship with JP, and people tend to think that they could be the next JP. Of course they can't, but the door is not as closed as if he was married.
And I don't care what the odds are of a man not being gay, when they are not seen romantically involved with a woman ..questions are asked.

I agree that "available" means not married. Matthew McConnaghay (sp?) is every girl's favorite, yet he is always in a relationship with someone. If he were to tie the knot after being "single" aka not married, his marketability will plummet. Not completely of course 'cause he is so darn cute!! But even I, a married woman, would probably not be as interested in him. (Matthew, I mean, not Elliott!)

Although, I'm the one that started that little rumor about an engagement (I have not let my daughter forget the trouble she caused!) I personally think it would be best for E to focus on his career with recording and touring at least for the first couple of years. I will be more than happy to share him with her by letting her tour with him for a little while and keep him company. I think she is good for him and will keep him relaxed and stress-free. After that, I truly hope they make a formal commitment. Maybe a beach wedding in Jamaica?? They will take beautiful pictures together!!!

Since they will be in their 30's at that time, it will be time to expand with little E's and JP's!!! Awww.... I can see the curls now!! :wub:

What woman?

How would she know what is in the hearts and minds of any couple. People do not have to marry after the first bedroom kiss (at least as far as I am aware there is no time rule to when a couple must marry). Personally, I think it is romantic yet responsible when couples take their time and explore the depth of their affection and devotion to each other.

I don’t have a huge collection of music, but I do have a collection (and half are male artists). I never based my purchase on whether the male artist was married or single. Actually it never occurred to me not to buy music I liked just because the male artist was married, in a relationship, single and not dating, or hopping from bed to bed. I just buy the music I like I don’t buy the man.

Does the same rule apply to female artists? That they should not marry and only be in shallow relationships, or only be seen with studley ornamental males every night and jump from bed to bed otherwise their music will not be marketable?

Seems kind of restrictive both to the artist as a person and those that like their music.

can someone give me a link to jamie paetz myspace page, can't find it, ty

Her myspace is private..

What is being spoken here are broad, general terms as to how the PUBLIC perceives artists and how record companies THINK the public perceives artists.

Fact is, some people hesitate to fan worship an artist who is married. I think it's silly because marital status does not matter to me as I am not silly enough to think I stand a chance, however, to some it fans it matters. I am also not silly enough to think if a man is dating a woman and not married to her, that he is more fair game than another. That is also silly. But we are talking about something called silly record marketers and some of the things they believe to be true about fans and the public nine times out of ten does not even resemble the truth!

I don't think Parsimmon is attempting to make Elliott's relationship with Jaime sound any less serious or less important than it is, she (from the way I am reading it) is talking about PERCEPTIONS of others. NOt that those perceptions are necessarily true.

In the eyes of a record company and those that market music, they probably do think it more safe to promote a man who is in a relationship but not married. That does not make being in a relationship less committed in the eyes of some, she is talking about how record companies perceive that the public will perceive it.

And Lord knows I don't like a record company's marketeer thinking for me as to what I would like or would not like but they try to do it all the time!